In an article on the mental health consequences of the Chernobyl disaster, published in a special section on Fukushima in The Journal of Radiological Protection,
 Distinguished Professor Evelyn Bromet, PhD makes a case for including 
standard measures of psychological well-being in the health monitoring 
of the victims of the nuclear disaster at Fukushima and for training the
 non-psychiatrist physicians in the region to recognize and follow up on
 common mental health problems. Dr. Bromet’s recommendations were based 
on a review of the literature related to the psychosocial consequences 
of radiation disasters as well as her own studies of populations 
affected by the Chernobyl disaster.
Dr. Bromet points out that 
people in the area of the Chernobyl plant were exposed not only to 
radiation, but to multiple psychological stressors, including 
displacement, separation from families, misinformation, and 
stigmatization. Comparisons of adult populations exposed to radiation 
with demographically matched comparison groups who were not exposed 
showed that after two decades the exposed populations had significantly 
poorer mental health. The analyses indicated that perceived (rather than
 actual) exposure to harmful levels of radiation was the key risk factor
 and that mothers of young children were at particularly high risk. In 
another study, clean-up workers (called liquidators) were found to have 
higher rates of suicide, depression, PTSD and severe headache compared 
to a matched comparison group. Studies of the long-term effects of 
exposure on the psychological and cognitive development of children 
yielded ambiguous results, partly because the researchers did not have 
direct access to data on exposure. 
Dr. Bromet points out in the 
article that the Chernobyl Forum, an organization sponsored by the 
United Nations, concluded that the greatest impact of the Chernobyl 
disaster, in terms of the number of people affected and its implications
 for public health, is its impact on mental health. This finding, she 
argues, suggests the importance of including monitors of mental health 
in the routine surveillance of populations affected by the accident at 
Fukushima, of providing credible information to disaster victims and of 
training physicians to recognize and treat common mental health 
problems, while keeping in mind the significance of perceived, rather 
than measured, exposure.
 
    